🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive law change that required local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.